ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
XIA Zhen-ying, CHEN Feng, LI Hong-jun. Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2012, 21(1): 89-96.
Citation: XIA Zhen-ying, CHEN Feng, LI Hong-jun. Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2012, 21(1): 89-96.

Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning

More Information
  • Received Date: October 26, 2011
  • Available Online: December 09, 2022
  • Objective: To discuss the influence of different injection rates of contrast medium with 64-slice helical CT on effect of liver arterial phase enhanced scanning.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients for abdominal CT enhanced scanning.All patients were divided into two groups,the normal group(A group) and the cirrhosis group(B group),each group had 40 cases.According to the injection rate of contrast medium,each group was divided into 2 groups,the 3.5 mL/s group(group A1,B1) and 2.5 mL/s group(group A2,B2).Using Smartprep tracking technology of contrast medium,when the abdominal aorta CT value reached or exceeded 150 Hu,pressed the scan button and began formal scan.Under different injection rate of contrast medium,the peak enhancement of abdominal aorta and trigger time of arterial phase were measured.Recorded good and excellent rats of normal and cirrhotic group,then compared statistical results.Results: When the injection rate of contrast medium was 3.5 mL/s and 2.5 mL/s,The good and excellent rates of normal group was 96.4% and 91.7% respectively,P>0.05,and that of cirrhosis group was 95.5% and 72.2% respectively,P<0.05.When injection rate of contrast medium was 2.5 mL/s,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta in normal and the liver cirrhosis group were 196.40 Hu ±20 Hu and 186.02 Hu ±18 Hu respectively,P>0.05;arterial phase average trigger time of normal group and cirrhosis group was 22 seconds and 24 seconds respectively,P<0.05.When the injection rate of contrast medium was 3.5 mL/s,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta in normal group and cirrhosis group were 244.90 Hu ±37 Hu and 219.33 Hu ±33 Hu respectively,P<0.05;the average trigger time of arterial phase in normal group and the liver cirrhosis group was 20 seconds and 22 seconds respectively,P<0.05.Conclusion: The injection rate of contrast medium is faster,the arterial phase peak is higher,the triggering time is shorter.In the same injection rate,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta of normal group is higher than that of cirrhosis group,and the average trigger time is shorter than that of cirrhosis group.Liver cirrhosis group needs higher speed on injection than normal group.
  • Related Articles

    [1]SU Danyang, HOU Ping, ZHANG Haoran, MA Yuanbo, LIU Jinlong, YANG Xiaopeng. Research Progress on Reducing Metal Artifacts in CT Imaging[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.023
    [2]CHEN Zonggui, WEI Ningning, LI Zhoufan, PAN Guihong, HUANG Minjiang. Methods Research on Correction for Intracranial Metal Artifacts Based on Prior Image Utilization[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(1): 141-148. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.002
    [3]ZHANG Wenjun, HUANG Gang, DING Haining, XU Hongchun. Research Progress of Scattering Artifact Correction in Medical Cone-beam Computed Tomography Imaging Based on Deep Learning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2023, 32(2): 285-296. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.131
    [4]LI Qiaoxin, JIN Ke, PANG Zhifeng. A Variational Model for Removing Concentric Elliptical Artifacts from CT Images[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(6): 773-781. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.085
    [5]LUO Chen, REN Qing, LIU Jianqiang, NIU Tianye. Development of Motion Artifact Correction Solutions for the Cone-beam CT Images during Pancreatic Cancer Image-guided Radiotherapy[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(6): 761-771. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.066
    [6]ZHANG Xue-song, ZHAO Bo-shan. Cupping Artifacts Calibration in CT Image Based on Radon Transform[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2016, 25(5): 539-546. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2016.25.05.05
    [7]GU Jian-wei, ZHANG Li, CHEN Zhi-qiang, XING Yu-xiang, GAO He-wei. The Review of Reasons and Correction Methods for Artifacts in ICT Images[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2005, 14(3): 24-28.
    [8]WANG Xue-li. Medical CT Artifact Analysis: Reason and Correction[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2004, 13(3): 1-8.
    [9]WANG Xue-li. Research and Discussion for CT Image Quality Evaluation[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2003, 12(3): 46-52.
    [10]Zu Donglin, He Qiang, Luo Qingfei, Jin Zhen, Bao Shanglian. The Correction of Motion Artifact with fMRI Using Image Registration[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2001, 10(4): 1-3.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 宋冉,梁长华,李强. 能谱CT结合血清miR-23a预测大面积急性心肌梗死患者主要心血管不良事件发生风险的价值. 海南医学. 2025(04): 528-533 .
    2. 夏宾,叶鹏飞,邵祎炜,李俊杰,李宇庆. 心肌灌注成像联合增强CT评估心肌缺血患者再灌注损伤的价值. 河南医学研究. 2024(03): 550-554 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (1392) PDF downloads (2) Cited by(2)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return