ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
HU Y Z, WU P F, CAO D, et al. Elucidation of the Efficacy of Low Tube Voltage Combined with AIIR in Suppressing Hip Prosthesis CT Artifacts[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(3): 377-384. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.334. (in Chinese).
Citation: HU Y Z, WU P F, CAO D, et al. Elucidation of the Efficacy of Low Tube Voltage Combined with AIIR in Suppressing Hip Prosthesis CT Artifacts[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(3): 377-384. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.334. (in Chinese).

Elucidation of the Efficacy of Low Tube Voltage Combined with AIIR in Suppressing Hip Prosthesis CT Artifacts

More Information
  • Received Date: December 29, 2024
  • Revised Date: February 12, 2025
  • Accepted Date: February 25, 2025
  • Available Online: March 10, 2025
  • Objective: To investigate the efficacy of low tube voltage combined with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) in suppressing metal artifacts during pelvic CT scans after hip arthroplasty. Methods: Data from 46 patients with hip replacements who underwent pelvic CT scans at our hospital were retrospectively collected and divided into a screening group (80 kVp) and a clinical group (120 kVp). Conventional reconstruction and AIIR reconstructions at levels 1~5 were performed. Subjective scoring of “wax-like” appearance and overall image quality was conducted. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn to calculate ΔCT of muscle, ΔCT of fat, SD of artifacts, SD of background, MAI, and CNR. Pairwise comparisons were made within each group, and the optimal reconstruction method within the screening group was compared with all methods applied in the clinical group. Volume CT dose indices were also compared. Results: As the AIIR level increased, the overall image quality score improved (better than conventional reconstruction), and the “wax-like” appearance decreased (no significant difference between AIIR level 5 and conventional reconstruction). With increasing AIIR level, image noise displayed an upward trend in both the screening and clinical groups, while CNR decreased. MAI increased in the screening group, but no significant difference was observed in the clinical group. However, both groups performed better than that obtained from conventional reconstruction. No significant differences were found in ΔCT of muscle and ΔCT of fat between AIIR levels, but AIIR significantly reduced these values in the screening group. The volume CT dose index of the screening group is significantly lower than that of the clinical group. There was no significant difference in ΔCT of muscle or fat between optimal AIIR level 5 in the screening group and all reconstructions in the clinical group, but other objective indicators showed differences. Subjective scores showed no significant difference between the clinical group and AIIR level 5, and all were better than other reconstructions. Conclusion: In pelvic CT scans of patients after hip arthroplasty, AIIR level 5 is the optimal level, and can significantly suppress noise and metal artifacts and improve CNR. Combining 80 kVp with AIIR level 5 reduces the radiation dose below that required with 120 kVp, while maintaining comparable subjective image quality.

  • [1]
    FERGUSON R J, PALMER A J R, TAYLOR A, et al. Hip replacement[J]. The Lancet, 2018, 392(10158): 1662-1671. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X.
    [2]
    GüNTHER K P, DECKERT S, LüTZNER C, et al. Total hip replacement for osteoarthritis—evidence-based and patient-oriented indications[J]. Deutsches Ä Rzteblatt International, 2021, 118(43): 730.
    [3]
    SELLES M, Van OSCH J A C, MAAS M, et al. Advances in metal artifact reduction in CT images: A review of traditional and novel metal artifact reduction techniques[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2024, 170: 111276. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111276.
    [4]
    HOKAMP N G, ECK B, SIEDEK F, et al. Quantification of metal artifacts in computed tomography: Methodological considerations[J]. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2020, 10(5): 1033. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2020.04.03.
    [5]
    PUVANASUNTHARARAJAH S, FONTANAROSA D, WILLE M L, et al. The application of metal artifact reduction methods on computed tomography scans for radiotherapy applications: A literature review[J]. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021, 22(6): 198-223. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13255.
    [6]
    张宝平, 李傲, 李宇航, 等. 人工智能迭代重建算法在腹部低剂量增强CT中的临床应用价值[J]. 遵义医科大学学报, 2024, 47(5): 487-494, 501. DOI: 10.14169/j.cnki.zunyixuebao.2024.0066.

    ZHANG B P, LI A, LI Y H, et al. Clinical application of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction algorithm in low-dose abdominal contrast-enhanced CT[J]. Journal of Zunyi Medical University, 2024, 47(5): 487-494, 501. DOI: 10.14169/j.cnki.zunyixuebao.2024.0066. (in Chinese).
    [7]
    曾栋, 张晓瑜, 马思源, 等. 低剂量医学CT成像技术: 过去, 现在与未来[J]. 中国体视学与图像分析, 2022, 27(4): 355-378. DOI: 10.13505/j.1007-1482.2022.27.04.005.

    ZENG D, ZHANG X Y, MA S Y, et al. Low-dose medical CT imaging: Past, present and future[J]. Chinese Journal of Stereology and Image Analysis, 2022, 27(4): 355-378. DOI: 10.13505/j.1007-1482.2022.27.04.005. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    MOHAMMADINEJAD P, KHANDELWAL A, INOUE A, et al. Utility of an automatic adaptive iterative metal artifact reduction AiMAR algorithm in improving CT imaging of patients with hip prostheses evaluated for suspected bladder malignancy[J]. Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47(6): 2158-2167. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03475-8.
    [9]
    游永春, 李万江, 刘洪川, 等. “三低”技术联合人工智能迭代重建算法在主动脉CT血管成像中的临床应用[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2022, 53(4): 676-681.

    YOU Y C, LI W J, LIU H C, et al. Clinical application of “three-low” technique combined with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction algorithm in aortic CT angiography[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2022, 53(4): 676-681. (in Chinese).
    [10]
    SCHRECK J, LAUKAMP K R, NIEHOFF J H, et al. Metal artifact reduction in patients with total hip replacements: Evaluation of clinical photon counting CT using virtual monoenergetic images[J]. European Radiology, 2023, 33(12): 9286-9295. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09879-4.
    [11]
    李杰, 袁源, 王春杰, 等. 能谱CT去金属伪影(MAR)技术用于减低单髋关节置换物伪影[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2021, 37(1): 131-135. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2021.01.032.

    LI J, YUAN Y, WANG C J, et al. Energy spectrum CT metal artifacts reduction (MAR) for reducing artifacts of unilateral hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2021, 37(1): 131-135. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2021.01.032. (in Chinese).
    [12]
    YANG F, LIANG Y W, SHAO Q, et al. Application value of CT metal artifact correction technology (MAC TM) in CT review after total hip replacement[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2020, 51(6): 828-833.
    [13]
    RAU A, STRAEHLE J, STEIN T, et al. Photon-counting computed tomography (PC-CT) of the spine: Impact on diagnostic confidence and radiation dose[J]. European Radiology, 2023, 33(8): 5578-5586. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09511-5.
    [14]
    WELLENBERG R H H, HAKVOORT E T, SLUMP C H, et al. Metal artifact reduction techniques in musculoskeletal CT-imaging[J]. European journal of radiology, 2018, 107: 60-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.010.
    [15]
    KHODARAHMI I, ISAAC A, FISHMAN E K, et al. Metal about the hip and artifact reduction techniques: From basic concepts to advanced imaging[C]//Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2019, 23(3): e68-e81.
    [16]
    LAUKAMP K R, LENNARTZ S, NEUHAUS V F, et al. CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: For artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar[J]. European Radiology, 2018, 28: 4524-4533. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5414-2.
    [17]
    KOHYAMA S, YOSHII Y, OKAMOTO Y, et al. Advances in bone joint imaging-metal artifact reduction[J]. Diagnostics, 2022, 12(12): 3079. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123079.
    [18]
    NJITI M M, OSMAN N D, MANSOR M S, et al. Potential of metal artifact reduction (MAR) and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) integration in CT metal artifact correction: A review[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2024: 111541.
    [19]
    杨名昊, 韩义成, 刘洪武, 等. 基于深度学习迭代重建算法的肺结节评估效果分析[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2024, 34(5): 75-77, 86.

    YANG M H, HAN Y C, LIU H W, et al. Performance analysis of deep learning-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in the evaluation of lung nodules[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2024, 34(5): 75-77, 86. (in Chinese).
    [20]
    曹建新, 朱卓, 张清, 等. 联合人工智能模型迭代重建和70kV超低管电压大幅度降低肺动脉CTA辐射剂量的研究[J]. 放射学实践, 2024, 39(10): 1361-1366. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.10.013.

    CAO J X, ZHU Z, ZHANG Q, et al. Study of dramatic reducing radiation dose of CT pulmonary angiography using artificial intelligence model-based iterative reconstruction with 70kV ultra-low tube voltage setting[J]. Radiologic Practice, 2024, 39(10): 1361-1366. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.10.013. (in Chinese).

Catalog

    Article views (18) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return