ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
程海平, 彭宙锋, 李亮, 曾菲菲, 查云飞. 心外膜脂肪组织体积和定量CT腰椎骨密度及其下腰痛相关性研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2021, 30(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.01.14
引用本文: 程海平, 彭宙锋, 李亮, 曾菲菲, 查云飞. 心外膜脂肪组织体积和定量CT腰椎骨密度及其下腰痛相关性研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2021, 30(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.01.14
CHENG Haiping, PENG Zhoufeng, LI Liang, CENG Feifei, CHA Yunfei. Study on the Correlation between the Volume of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Lumbar Bone Mineral Density[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.01.14
Citation: CHENG Haiping, PENG Zhoufeng, LI Liang, CENG Feifei, CHA Yunfei. Study on the Correlation between the Volume of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Lumbar Bone Mineral Density[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.01.14

心外膜脂肪组织体积和定量CT腰椎骨密度及其下腰痛相关性研究

Study on the Correlation between the Volume of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Lumbar Bone Mineral Density

  • 摘要: 目的:探索基于胸部CT平扫的心外膜脂肪体积(EAT)与定量CT腰椎骨密度(BMD)及其下腰痛的相关性。方法:回顾性分析600例行胸部CT平扫和腰椎骨密度定量CT体检人群的影像组资料。将纳入对象按照腰椎骨密度分组,对纳入者的胸部CT平扫影像图像重建,提取心外膜脂肪并计算其体积。采用单因素方差分析检测不同组别患者心外膜脂肪体积差异,骨密度和心外膜脂肪相关性检验使用Pearson相关系数。最后利用logistic多元回归拟合受试者临床信息,建立预测体检人群下腰痛的数学模型,并采用测试者曲线和决策者曲线评估模型的诊断效能和临床获益度。结果:不同观测者心外膜脂肪体积值测量值具有较高一致性。骨密度正常组、骨量减少组、骨质疏松组3组受试者心外膜脂肪体积差异均存在统计学意义(F=65.8,P<0.001)。心外膜脂肪体积与腰椎骨小梁密度存在负相关关系(r=-0.80595%CI:-0.858,-0.745)。腰椎骨密度、心外膜脂肪体积以及临床综合模型受试者曲线下面积分别为0.80(95%CI:0.75~0.83),0.75(95%CI:0.72~0.81),0.88(95%CI:0.81~0.94)。腰椎骨密度、心外膜脂肪体积和临床混合模型的临床获益阈值区间分别为0.02~0.89,0.05~0.82,0.01~0.98。结论:不同骨密度人群心外膜脂肪体积存在差异。心外膜脂肪体积与腰椎骨密度存在负相关关系。基于腰椎骨密度和心外膜脂肪体积等临床指标建立的诊断模型对于体检人群下腰痛具有较好预测效果。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To investigate the relationship between epicardial adipose tissue(EAT) volume and Lumbar bone mineral density(BMD). Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed non-contrast CT images and QCT images from 600 patients. Subjects were grouped according to BMD. The EAT was extracted from the chest CT images of the admitted patient and the volume was calculated. The difference of EAT volume was detected by one-way analysis of variance. The correlation between BMD and EAT was tested by Pearson Correlation Coefficient. A two-sided P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was a significant difference in the volume of EAT among the normal group, osteopenia group and osteoporosis group(F=65.80, P<0.001), and there was a negative correlation between the volume of epicardial fat and BMD(r=-0.805 95% CI:-0.858,-0.745). The area under the curve of BMD, the volume of epicardial fat and the clinical mixed model were 0.80(95% CI:0.75 ~ 0.83), 0.75(95% CI:0.72 ~ 0.81) and 0.88(95% CI:0.81 ~ 0.94), respectively. The clinical benefit thresholds of lumbar BMD, epicardial fat volume and clinical mixed model were 0.02 ~ 0.89, 0.05 ~ 0.82 and 0.01 ~ 0.98, respectively. Conclusion: The volume of EAT is closely related to the BMD of lumbar spine. The volume of EAT might be used as a potential biomarker to evaluate the BMD of lumbar spine. The diagnosis model based on clinical factors has a good prediction effect on low back pain in physical examination population.

     

/

返回文章
返回