ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
李孟静, 霍英杰, 宫凤玲, 张惠英, 徐慧慧, 王星稳, 马春梅. MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019, 28(5): 609-615. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.11
引用本文: 李孟静, 霍英杰, 宫凤玲, 张惠英, 徐慧慧, 王星稳, 马春梅. MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019, 28(5): 609-615. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.11
LI Mengjing, HUO Yingjie, GONG Fengling, ZHANG Huiying, XV Huihui, WANG Xingwen, MA Chunmei. Application Value of Different Post-processing Techniques of MSCT in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Hernia[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 609-615. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.11
Citation: LI Mengjing, HUO Yingjie, GONG Fengling, ZHANG Huiying, XV Huihui, WANG Xingwen, MA Chunmei. Application Value of Different Post-processing Techniques of MSCT in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Hernia[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 609-615. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.11

MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值

Application Value of Different Post-processing Techniques of MSCT in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Hernia

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)的不同组合后处理技术在腹内疝(IAH)诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析手术证实的63例行腹部增强扫描IAH患者,其中22例为腹内疝伴绞窄性肠梗阻,41例为腹内疝伴非绞窄性肠梗阻,将不同后处理技术进行组合:多平面重组(MPR)+最大密度投影(MIP)组;MPR+曲面重组(CPR)组,根据咖啡豆征/假肿瘤征、鸟嘴征、肠系膜漩涡征/缆绳征、同心圆征等征象,对IAH的定位、定性作出判断,分析结果。结果:十二指肠旁疝3例、Winslow孔疝1例盲肠周围疝2例、肠粘连束带型腹内疝57例,MPR+MIP组准确率(80.95%),MPR+CPR组准确率(76.19%),两组在IAH类型诊断中无统计学差异(P>0.05);在显示漩涡征/缆绳征及同心圆征结果中,MPR+MIP组(58.73%和26.98%)均高于MPR+CPR组(49.21%和12.70%),两组具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在MPR+MIP组合后处理技术能很好地对IAH作出诊断,因而可在IAH影像诊断中加以推广。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the application value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in the diagnosis of internal abdominal hernia (IAH) with different combined post-processing techniques. Method: A retrospective analysis of 63 cases of intra-abdominal hernia with abdominal enhanced scanning, confirmed by the operation, of which 22 were intra-abdominal hernia with strangulated intestinal obstruction, 41 were intra-abdominal hernia with non-strangulated intestinal obstruction, and different post-processing techniques were combined. Results: Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +maximum intensity projection (MIP) group and Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +curved planar reformation (CPR) group. According to the signs of coffee bean sign/pseudotumor sign, bird's mouth sign, mesenteric whirlpool sign/cable sign, concentric circle sign and so on, making a judgment about the localization and qualitative analysis of abdominal internal hernia and the results were analyzed. Conclusion: 3 cases of parduodenal hernia, 1 case of Winslow's foramen hernia, 2 cases of pericecal hernia, and 57 cases of intra-abdominal hernia of intestinal adhesive band. The accuracy rate of MPR+MIP group and MPR+CPR group are 80.95% and 76.19%, respectly. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia (P>0.05).The results of whirlpool sign/cable sign and concentric circle sign were higher in MPR+MIP group (58.73%, 26.98%) than that in MPR+CPR group (49.21%, 12.70%). There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The combined post-processing technique of MPR+MIP can make a diagnosis of IAH better, so it can be widely expanded in the imaging diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia.

     

/

返回文章
返回