ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    3.0 T MRI Vibe-Dixon序列在胸椎增强横断位扫描中的效果评价

    Evaluation of the effect of 3.0 T MRI Vibe-Dixon sequence on contrast-enhanced axial thoracic imaging

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨3.0T MRI T1 Vibe-Dixon(Vibe-Dixon)在胸椎增强横断位扫描中的效果。方法:选取2023年2月至2023年10月该院疑似胸椎疾病并接受胸椎MRI增强检查的50患者为研究对象,同时进行Vibe-Dixon、Fl2d-fs、Tse-Dixon及Tse-fs 4个序列的胸椎增强MRI横断位扫描。比较4组图像T8椎体及同一层面的脊髓、软组织和空气的信号强度(SI)和噪声标准差(SD),并计算信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。采用Kappa分析检验4组图像在整体图像质量、运动伪影和诊断信心方面的一致性。结果:在客观评分方面,Vibe-Dixon序列在椎体、脊髓、软组织中的SNR值均高于 Fl2d-fs、Tse-fs、Tse-Dixon序列,差异均有统计学意义。Vibe-Dixon序列和 Fl2d-fs序列在软组织中的SNR值比较,差异无统计学意义,而Tse-fs序列和Tse-Dixon序列在椎体、脊髓和软组织中的SNR值比较,差异无统计学意义。Vibe-Dixon序列的脊髓-软组织CNR高于Tse-Dixon、Tse-fs序列,差异均有统计学意义;Vibe-Dixon序列的脊髓-软组织CNR低于Fl2d-fs序列,差异有统计学意义。主观评分方面,Vibe-Dixon序列的整体图像质量、运动伪影和诊断信心高于Fl2d-fs、Tse-Dixon、Tse-fs序列,差异均有统计学意义。2名诊断医师对4组图像的评价一致性均较好(Kappa=0.72~0.921)。结论:与Tse-Dixon、Fl2d-fs、Tse-fs序列比较,Vibe-Dixon序列可以减少运动伪影,获得更好的胸椎增强横断位的图像质量,具有取代TSE等增强序列的可行性。

       

      Abstract: Objective This study aimed to assess image contrast and evaluate 3.0T T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for enhanced thoracic spine imaging. Methods Fifty patients with clinically suspected thoracic vertebral disease who underwent thoracic MRI between February 2023 and October 2023 were prospectively included. Each patient underwent MRI using four distinct sequences: Vibe-Dixon, Fl2d-fs, Tse-Dixon, and Tse-fs. A senior MR technician measured the signal intensity (SI) and standard deviation (SD) of the T8 vertebrae and the spinal cord, soft tissue, and air across the four imaging modalities. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated. Two experienced radiologists used a double-blind method to score and evaluate the overall image quality, image motion artifacts, and diagnostic confidence of the four imaging sequences, and kappa analysis was performed to assess inter-observer agreement. Results In terms of objective scoring, the SNR values for the Vibe-Dixon sequence in the vertebral body, spinal cord, and soft tissue were higher than those of the Fl2d-fs, Tse-fs, and Tse-Dixon sequences, and the differences were statistically significant. SNR value comparisons between the Vibe-Dixon and Fl2d-fs sequences for soft tissue showed no statistically significant differences, and comparisons between the Tse-fs and Tse-Dixon sequences in the vertebral body, spinal cord, and soft tissue showed no statistically significant differences, as well. The spinal cord soft tissue CNR of the Vibe-Dixon sequence was significantly higher than that of the Tse-Dixon and Tse-fs sequences. Notably, the CNR of the spinal soft tissue with the Vibe-Dixon sequence was significantly lower than that of the Fl2d-fs sequence. In the subjective evaluation, the overall image quality, motion artifacts, and diagnostic confidence of the Vibe-Dixon sequence were superior to those of the Fl2d-fs, Tse-Dixon, and Tse-fs sequences, and these differences were statistically significant. The evaluation of the four sets of images by two radiologists showed good consistency (Kappa=0.72−0.921). Conclusion Compared with the Tse-Dixon, Fl2d-fs, and Tse-fs sequences, the Vibe-Dixon sequences can reduce motion artifacts and obtain better image quality of the thoracic spine-enhanced transection position. In addition, it is feasible to replace Tse and other sequences after enhancement.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回