ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    冠状动脉CT血管造影血流储备分数联合斑块定量分析及危险分层评估斑块进展的价值

    The Value of CT-FFR Combined with Plaque Measurements and Risk Assessment for Evaluating Plaque Progression

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)中斑块定量指标、冠状动脉血流储备分数(FFR)及不同危险分层评估斑块进展的能力及三者联合预测斑块进展的效能。方法:回顾性分析研究对象的临床资料及两次CCTA资料,根据斑块负荷变化率分为进展组和非进展组,根据斑块特征分为高危、低危斑块组。比较低危、高危组下进展和非进展组斑块的定量特征及CT-FFR等参数。构建斑块定量特征和CT-FFR的预测模型,评估所构建模型的预测能力。结果:斑块进展组比非进展组狭窄程度更严重,最小管腔面积更小,斑块长度更长,斑块总体积、非钙化体积更大,斑块负荷更高,CT-FFR值更低。Logistic回归模型分析显示CT-FFR与斑块进展呈负相关(OR=0.922,95% CI:0.854~0.997,P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析狭窄程度+斑块定量特征+CT-FFR模型(模型3)最优(AUC=0.831,95% CI:0.73~0.91,P < 0.001)。结论:斑块的定量参数和CT-FFR可以识别斑块进展,CT-FFR、斑块定量分析及危险分层三者联合应用可提升斑块进展风险的预测效能。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To assess the ability of quantitative plaque parameters derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and different risk stratifications to evaluate coronary plaque progression, and to evaluate the efficacy of their combination for the prediction of plaque progression.
      Methods : Clinical data and serial CCTA imaging data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into a progression or a non-progression plaque group based on the rate of change of plaque burden, and patients were also stratified into a high-risk or a low-risk plaque group based on morphological characteristics. Within the low-risk and high-risk plaque groups, quantitative plaque features and CTTA-FFR parameters were compared between the progression and the non-progression plaque groups. Predictive models incorporating quantitative plaque features and CTTA-FFR values were constructed, and their predictive performance was evaluated.
      Results Compared to the non-progression plaque group, the progression plaque group had more severe stenosis, a smaller minimum lumen area, longer plaque length, larger total plaque volume and non-calcified plaque volume, higher plaque burden, and lower CTTA-FFR values (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant negative correlation between CT-FFR values and plaque progression (odds ratio, 0.922; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.854-0.997; P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the combined model incorporating stenosis severity, quantitative plaque features, and CTTA-FFR values as the optimal predictor (area under the ROC curve, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91; P < 0.001).
      Conclusion Quantitative CCTA-FFR plaque parameters can predict plaque progression. The combination of CTTA-FFR, quantitative plaque analysis, and risk stratification enhances predictive efficacy for assessing the risk of plaque progression.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回