ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    基于光谱CT在低剂量对比剂和流率肺动脉成像中的可行性研究

    Feasibility Study of Spectral CT for Pulmonary Angiography Using Low-volume Contrast Agent and Low-flow-rate Protocol

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨低对比剂剂量和流率在双层探测器光谱CT进行肺动脉CTA(CTPA)检查的可行性。方法:收集80例临床疑似肺动脉栓塞行CTPA检查的患者,随机分为两组,每组各40例,低剂量组对比剂剂量15 mL,流率2.0 mL/s,所得图像行40 keV单能谱重建;常规组使用小剂量测试法,对比剂总剂量50ml,流率5.0 mL/s。记录并计算两组患者图像的容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)、有效辐射剂量(ED)、CT值、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR),并对图像质量进行主观评分。结果:①常规组和低剂量组的肺动脉干CT值分别为368.450 HU和569.050 HU,差异具有统计学意义;两组间SNR、CNR差异具有统计学意义;②两组图像质量的主观评分,差异无统计学意义;③常规组和低剂量组的DLP分别为376.500 mGy·cm和294.500 mGy·cm;CTDIvol分别为11.1502 mGy和8.350 mGy,ED分别为5.271 mSv和4.123 mSv,差异具有统计学意义。结论:双层探测器光谱CT在肺动脉CTA检查中应用低对比剂剂量和流率的扫描方案可以满足诊断需求,降低了对比剂渗漏和对比剂肾病等风险。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the feasibility of using a low-dose contrast agent volume and a low flow rate in dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography (CT) for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).
      Methods In total, 80 patients clinically diagnosed with pulmonary embolisms were collected for CTPA examination and randomly divided into two groups, comprising 40 cases each. The low-dose group received a contrast agent dose of 15 mL at a flow rate of 2 mL/s, and the images were reconstructed using a 40 keV monochromatic spectrum. The conventional group underwent a small-dose test with a contrast agent dose of 50 mL at a flow rate of 5.0 mL/s. The CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were recorded and calculated for both groups, and the image quality was subjectively scored.
      Results (1) The differences in these indicators between the two groups were statistically significant. The pulmonary artery CT values for the conventional and the low-dose groups were 368.450 HU and 569.050 HU, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in SNR and CNR between the two groups. (2) There was no statistically significant difference in the subjective scoring of image quality between the two groups. (3) The DLP values for the conventional and low-dose groups were 376.500 mGy/cm and 294.500 mGy/cm, respectively; the CTDIvol values were 11.150 mGy and 8.350 mGy, respectively; and the ED values were 5.271 mSv and 4.123 mSv, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups.
      Conclusion The scanning protocol with the "low" contrast agent dose and flow rate using dual-layer detector spectral CT for CTPA examinations met the diagnostic requirements while reducing risks such as contrast extravasation and contrast-induced nephropathy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回