ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P

心脏CT平扫与CTA定量分析心外膜脂肪体积对比研究

程凯, 查云飞, 胡磊, 曾菲菲, 彭宙锋

程凯, 查云飞, 胡磊, 曾菲菲, 彭宙锋. 心脏CT平扫与CTA定量分析心外膜脂肪体积对比研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019, 28(5): 585-591. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.08
引用本文: 程凯, 查云飞, 胡磊, 曾菲菲, 彭宙锋. 心脏CT平扫与CTA定量分析心外膜脂肪体积对比研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019, 28(5): 585-591. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.08
CHENG Kai, ZHA Yunfei, HU Lei, ZENG Feifei, PENG Zhoufeng. A Comparative Study of Non-contrast Cardiac CT and Coronary CT Angiography in Quantitative Analysis of Epicardial Fat Volume[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 585-591. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.08
Citation: CHENG Kai, ZHA Yunfei, HU Lei, ZENG Feifei, PENG Zhoufeng. A Comparative Study of Non-contrast Cardiac CT and Coronary CT Angiography in Quantitative Analysis of Epicardial Fat Volume[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 585-591. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.08

心脏CT平扫与CTA定量分析心外膜脂肪体积对比研究

详细信息
    作者简介:

    程凯(1988-),男,鄂州市中心医院信息科工程师,生物医学工程硕士在读,主要从事医院信息化建设及医疗设备管理相关工作,Tel:18071178026,E-mail:258882792@qq.com;查云飞*(1972-),男,医学博士、博士后,武汉大学人民医院放射科主任,擅长血管病变及骨骼肌肉病变影像学,Tel:13006188899,E-mail:zhayunfei999@126.com。

  • 中图分类号: R812

A Comparative Study of Non-contrast Cardiac CT and Coronary CT Angiography in Quantitative Analysis of Epicardial Fat Volume

  • 摘要: 目的:对比研究基于心电门控的心脏CT平扫(NCT)与冠状动脉CTA定量评价冠心病患者心外膜脂肪体积(EFV)的一致性。方法:回顾性分析临床诊断冠心病同期行心脏CT平扫和冠状动脉CTA检查患者40例。心外膜边界由2位具有丰富心血管CT临床工作经验的医师(观察者1和2)采用GE AW4.7工作站自动软件自动勾勒心外膜轮廓,EFV结果由软件自动计算生成。采用线性回归分析、Bland-Altman分析法及组内相关系数(ICC)评价两观察者间的一致性。结果:NCT和冠状动脉CTA测得EFV分别为(99.43±43.78)cm3和(93.66±48.49)cm3,两者差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察者1在NCT和CTA的重复系数(CR)误差分别为10.01cm3和7.83cm3;观察者2在NCT和CTA的CR误差分别为11.05cm3和7.58cm3。NCT的CR为8.05cm3;CTA的CR为7.13cm3。各组ICC均大于0.96。结论:基于心电门控的心脏CT平扫和冠状动脉CTA均可用于EFV的评估。
    Abstract: Objective: To compare non-contrast cardiac CT (NCT) and coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA) for quantitative analysis of epicardial fat volume (EFV) in coronary artery disease cohort. Method: Forty patients underwent retrospective NCT and coronary CTA with ECG-gated. Epicardial boundaries were traced by 2 experienced radiologists (operator 1 and operators 2). EFV was calculated by Autocontour software (AW4.7 workstation, GE). Linear Regression, Bland-Altman method, Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) and Intra Class Correlation (ICC) were computed to analyze the inter-observer variability. Result: There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between NCT (99.43±43.78cm3) and coronary CTA (93.66±48.49cm3) in mean EFV values. For operator 1, CR errors were 10.01cm3 (NCT) and 7.83cm3 (coronary CTA), respectively. For operator 2, CR errors were 11.05 cm3 (NCT) and 7.58cm3(coronary CTA), respectively. ICC values >0.96 were obtained in all cases. CR values were 8.05 cm3 for NCT and 7.13cm3 for CTA. Conclusion: Both NCT and coronary CTA can be used to computer-assist measurements of EFV with ECG-gated.
  • 期刊类型引用(4)

    1. 张益民,郑一兵. 心脏CT平扫与CT血管造影定量分析对心外膜脂肪体积的测定效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(03): 21-24 . 百度学术
    2. 梁健华,林永开,吴洁瑶,邓立维,杨春阳,李远章. 低剂量心脏平扫与冠脉CT血管造影在测量心外膜脂肪体积方面具有等效性. 分子影像学杂志. 2022(02): 189-193 . 百度学术
    3. 姜育,张洁,陈群,李亚. 心外膜脂肪组织厚度对2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者血管事件发生的预测价值. 陕西医学杂志. 2021(05): 542-545+554 . 百度学术
    4. 董相宇,方挺松,王文会,袁健祥,冯有丽,梁振华,杨延斌. 单位体表面积心外膜脂肪容积与房颤的相关性研究. CT理论与应用研究. 2020(06): 702-710 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  760
  • HTML全文浏览量:  62
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-07-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-11-07
  • 发布日期:  2019-10-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭