ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
刘娜, 赵正凯, 邹佳瑜, 李易, 刘建. 基于人工智能的胸部CT肺结节检出及良恶性诊断效能评估[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2021, 30(6): 709-715. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.06
引用本文: 刘娜, 赵正凯, 邹佳瑜, 李易, 刘建. 基于人工智能的胸部CT肺结节检出及良恶性诊断效能评估[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2021, 30(6): 709-715. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.06
LIU Na, ZHAO Zhengkai, ZOU Jiayu, LI Yi, LIU Jian. Evaluation of Detection and Diagnostic Efficiency of Pulmonary Nodules by Chest CT Based on Artificial Intelligence[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 709-715. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.06
Citation: LIU Na, ZHAO Zhengkai, ZOU Jiayu, LI Yi, LIU Jian. Evaluation of Detection and Diagnostic Efficiency of Pulmonary Nodules by Chest CT Based on Artificial Intelligence[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 709-715. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.06

基于人工智能的胸部CT肺结节检出及良恶性诊断效能评估

Evaluation of Detection and Diagnostic Efficiency of Pulmonary Nodules by Chest CT Based on Artificial Intelligence

  • 摘要: 目的:评估基于深度学习的人工智能(AI)软件在胸部CT肺结节检出及良恶性诊断的价值。方法:收集2018年6月至2020年4月本院经手术确诊的肺结节患者172例,共切除204枚结节。将172例术前高分辨胸部CT图像导入人工智能识别系统,分别采用人工智能和影像医师阅片检出肺结节及良恶性诊断,对比两种阅片方法的敏感度、阳性预测值及假阳性结节个数。以病理结果为诊断金标准,对比AI与影像医师在恶性肺结节诊断中的敏感度、特异度及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。结果:172例胸部高分辨CT共检出796枚真结节;AI与影像医师检出结节的敏感度分别为90.5%和75.0%,阳性预测值分别为74.5%和99.7%,假阳性结节总数分别为247个和2个。204枚经手术切除的结节中,AI、影像医师及AI联合影像医师诊断恶性肺结节的敏感度分别为93.3%、78.5%和98.6%,特异度分别为34.8%、79.7%和79.7%;AI、影像医师及AI联合影像医师诊断恶性肺结节的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.641、0.791和0.819。结论:AI检测肺结节的敏感度明显高于影像医师,但AI假阳性率亦较高;AI联合影像医师诊断恶性肺结节效能高于AI或影像医师单独诊断;建议AI联合影像医师共同检出肺结节和良恶性诊断,可以降低漏诊率、提高诊断正确率。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) based on deep learning in the detection and diagnosis of chest CT pulmonary nodules. Methods: A total of 172 patients with pulmonary nodules diagnosed by surgery in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020 were collected, and a total of 204 nodules were surgically resected. 172 cases of preoperative high-resolution chest CT images were imported into the artificial intelligence recognition system, then artificial intelligence (AI) and radiologists detected and diagnosed the pulmonary nodules respectively, and we compared the sensitivity, positive predictive value and false positive rate between the two diagnostic methods. Using the pathological results as the gold standard for diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of AI and radiologists in the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules were compared. Results: A total of 796 true nodules were detected in the 172 cases of high-resolution chest CT images. The sensitivity of AI and radiologists in detecting nodules was respectively 90.5% and 75.0%, the positive predictive value was respectively 74.5% and 99.7%, and the number of false positive nodules was respectively 247 and 2.As for the surgically resected 204 nodules, the sensitivity of AI, radiologist and AI-radiologist combination in diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules was respectively 93.3%, 78.5% and 98.6%, the specificity was respectively 34.8%, 79.7% and 79.7%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules by AI, radiologist and AI-radiologist combination was respectively 0.641, 0.791 and 0.819. Conclusion: The sensitivity of AI in detecting pulmonary nodules is significantly higher than that of radiologists, yet the false positive rate of AI is also higher. The efficiency of AI-radiologist combination in diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules is higher than that of AI or radiologists separately. Therefore, we recommend that AI and radiologists should collaborate to detect and diagnose pulmonary nodules, which can reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the diagnosis accuracy.

     

/

返回文章
返回